Spaces:
Running
Running
Removed image from readme
Browse files- README.md +1 -4
- pipeline.png +0 -0
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -93,10 +93,7 @@ In our implementation, we expand upon the methodology presented in the original
|
|
| 93 |
extractive model summaries. The primary approach in the paper involved ranking sentences in the source document based on
|
| 94 |
ground-truth reference sentences. The Normalized Cumulative Gain (NCG) score was computed using the formula:
|
| 95 |
|
| 96 |
-
```ncg = $\frac{\text{cumulative gain}}{\text{ideal cumulative gain}}$```
|
| 97 |
-
|
| 98 |
-
as depicted in the following image:
|
| 99 |
-

|
| 100 |
|
| 101 |
Key deviations in our implementation from the paper include:
|
| 102 |
1. **Inclusion of Abstractive Model Summaries:** Unlike the paper, which exclusively considered extractive model
|
|
|
|
| 93 |
extractive model summaries. The primary approach in the paper involved ranking sentences in the source document based on
|
| 94 |
ground-truth reference sentences. The Normalized Cumulative Gain (NCG) score was computed using the formula:
|
| 95 |
|
| 96 |
+
```ncg = $\frac{\text{cumulative gain}}{\text{ideal cumulative gain}}$```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 97 |
|
| 98 |
Key deviations in our implementation from the paper include:
|
| 99 |
1. **Inclusion of Abstractive Model Summaries:** Unlike the paper, which exclusively considered extractive model
|
pipeline.png
DELETED
|
Binary file (125 kB)
|
|
|