Improve dataset card: Add task categories, tags, HF paper link, and sample usage
#1
by
nielsr
HF Staff
- opened
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,9 +1,13 @@
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
-
pretty_name: ENACT
|
| 3 |
language:
|
| 4 |
- en
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
task_categories:
|
| 6 |
- visual-question-answering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
configs:
|
| 8 |
- config_name: default
|
| 9 |
data_files:
|
|
@@ -26,32 +30,32 @@ dataset_info:
|
|
| 26 |
sequence: string
|
| 27 |
- name: gt_answer
|
| 28 |
sequence: int32
|
| 29 |
-
license: mit
|
| 30 |
tags:
|
| 31 |
- agent
|
| 32 |
-
|
| 33 |
-
-
|
| 34 |
---
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
# ENACT: Evaluating Embodied Cognition with World Modeling of Egocentric Interaction
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
ENACT is a benchmark dataset for evaluating **embodied cognition** in vision–language models via **egocentric world modeling**. It probes whether models can reason about how the world changes under sequences of actions, using long-horizon household activities in a mobile manipulation setting.
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
-
-
|
| 41 |
-
-
|
|
|
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
## Dataset Summary
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
Each ENACT example is a **multi-image, multi-step reasoning problem** built from robot trajectories:
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
-
-
|
| 49 |
-
|
| 50 |
-
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
-
-
|
| 53 |
-
|
| 54 |
-
|
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
All images are egocentric RGB observations rendered from long-horizon household tasks (e.g., assembling gift baskets, bringing water, preparing lunch boxes, cleaning up a desk).
|
| 57 |
|
|
@@ -106,30 +110,57 @@ Each line in `enact_ordering.jsonl` is a JSON object:
|
|
| 106 |
}
|
| 107 |
```
|
| 108 |
|
| 109 |
-
*
|
| 110 |
-
*
|
| 111 |
-
*
|
| 112 |
-
*
|
| 113 |
-
*
|
| 114 |
|
| 115 |
-
|
| 116 |
-
|
| 117 |
-
*
|
| 118 |
-
*
|
| 119 |
|
| 120 |
|
| 121 |
-
## Usage
|
| 122 |
-
To evaluate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 123 |
|
| 124 |
|
| 125 |
## Citation
|
| 126 |
|
| 127 |
-
If you use ENACT, please cite the paper:
|
| 128 |
-
```
|
| 129 |
@article{wang2025enact,
|
| 130 |
title={ENACT: Evaluating Embodied Cognition with World Modeling of Egocentric Interaction},
|
| 131 |
author={Wang, Qineng and Huang, Wenlong and Zhou, Yu and Yin, Hang
|
| 132 |
and Bao, Tianwei and Lyu, Jianwen and Liu, Weiyu and Zhang, Ruohan
|
| 133 |
-
and Wu, Jiajun and Li, Fei-Fei and Li, Manling}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 134 |
}
|
| 135 |
```
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
language:
|
| 3 |
- en
|
| 4 |
+
license: mit
|
| 5 |
+
size_categories:
|
| 6 |
+
- 1K<n<10K
|
| 7 |
task_categories:
|
| 8 |
- visual-question-answering
|
| 9 |
+
- image-text-to-text
|
| 10 |
+
pretty_name: ENACT
|
| 11 |
configs:
|
| 12 |
- config_name: default
|
| 13 |
data_files:
|
|
|
|
| 30 |
sequence: string
|
| 31 |
- name: gt_answer
|
| 32 |
sequence: int32
|
|
|
|
| 33 |
tags:
|
| 34 |
- agent
|
| 35 |
+
- robotics
|
| 36 |
+
- embodied-cognition
|
| 37 |
---
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
# ENACT: Evaluating Embodied Cognition with World Modeling of Egocentric Interaction
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
ENACT is a benchmark dataset for evaluating **embodied cognition** in vision–language models via **egocentric world modeling**. It probes whether models can reason about how the world changes under sequences of actions, using long-horizon household activities in a mobile manipulation setting.
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
+
- **Paper:** [https://huggingface.co/papers/2511.20937](https://huggingface.co/papers/2511.20937)
|
| 44 |
+
- **Project page:** https://enact-embodied-cognition.github.io/
|
| 45 |
+
- **Code & evaluation:** https://github.com/mll-lab-nu/ENACT
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
## Dataset Summary
|
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
Each ENACT example is a **multi-image, multi-step reasoning problem** built from robot trajectories:
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
+
- **Forward world modeling**
|
| 53 |
+
- Input: one **current state image**, several **future state images** (shuffled), and a list of **actions in correct order**.
|
| 54 |
+
- Task: output a Python list of integers giving the **correct chronological order of future images** (e.g., `[1, 3, 2]`).
|
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
+
- **Inverse world modeling**
|
| 57 |
+
- Input: an **ordered sequence of images** showing state changes, plus **actions in shuffled order**.
|
| 58 |
+
- Task: output a Python list of integers giving the **correct chronological order of actions** (e.g., `[2, 3, 1]`).
|
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
All images are egocentric RGB observations rendered from long-horizon household tasks (e.g., assembling gift baskets, bringing water, preparing lunch boxes, cleaning up a desk).
|
| 61 |
|
|
|
|
| 110 |
}
|
| 111 |
```
|
| 112 |
|
| 113 |
+
* **`id`** – unique identifier for this QA instance.
|
| 114 |
+
* **`type`** – question type and horizon, e.g. `forward_world_modeling_3_steps` or `inverse_world_modeling_4_steps`.
|
| 115 |
+
* **`task_name`** – underlying household task instance.
|
| 116 |
+
* **`key_frame_ids`** – frame indices of selected key frames in the trajectory.
|
| 117 |
+
* **`images`** – relative paths to PNG images:
|
| 118 |
|
| 119 |
+
* index 0 is the **current state**;
|
| 120 |
+
* subsequent entries are **future states** (forward) or later states (inverse).
|
| 121 |
+
* **`question`** – natural language prompt specifying the task setup, actions, and the required output as a Python list of integers.
|
| 122 |
+
* **`gt_answer`** – ground-truth ordering of image or action labels (list of integers, e.g. `[1, 3, 2]`).
|
| 123 |
|
| 124 |
|
| 125 |
+
## Sample Usage
|
| 126 |
+
To evaluate your model on the ENACT dataset, follow these steps:
|
| 127 |
+
|
| 128 |
+
1. **Download the ENACT QA dataset:**
|
| 129 |
+
```bash
|
| 130 |
+
python scripts/helpers/download_dataset.py
|
| 131 |
+
```
|
| 132 |
+
|
| 133 |
+
2. **Run your model** on `data/QA/enact_ordering.jsonl` to generate predictions. Your model should output a JSONL file (e.g., `enact_ordering_mymodel.jsonl`) where each line contains the original fields plus an `answer` field as a stringified list (e.g., `"[2, 1]"`).
|
| 134 |
+
|
| 135 |
+
3. **Evaluate your predictions:**
|
| 136 |
+
```bash
|
| 137 |
+
enact eval enact_ordering_mymodel.jsonl --analyze-wrong-cases
|
| 138 |
+
```
|
| 139 |
+
|
| 140 |
+
4. **Check results:**
|
| 141 |
+
```bash
|
| 142 |
+
cat data/evaluation/meta_performance/enact_ordering_mymodel.json
|
| 143 |
+
```
|
| 144 |
+
|
| 145 |
+
5. **For batch evaluation of multiple models:**
|
| 146 |
+
```bash
|
| 147 |
+
enact eval model_outputs_directory/ --analyze-wrong-cases
|
| 148 |
+
cat data/evaluation/batch_evaluation_summary.json
|
| 149 |
+
```
|
| 150 |
+
|
| 151 |
+
For more details on data generation and advanced evaluation options, please refer to the [code repository](https://github.com/mll-lab-nu/ENACT).
|
| 152 |
|
| 153 |
|
| 154 |
## Citation
|
| 155 |
|
| 156 |
+
If you use ENACT in your research, please cite the paper:
|
| 157 |
+
```bibtex
|
| 158 |
@article{wang2025enact,
|
| 159 |
title={ENACT: Evaluating Embodied Cognition with World Modeling of Egocentric Interaction},
|
| 160 |
author={Wang, Qineng and Huang, Wenlong and Zhou, Yu and Yin, Hang
|
| 161 |
and Bao, Tianwei and Lyu, Jianwen and Liu, Weiyu and Zhang, Ruohan
|
| 162 |
+
and Wu, Jiajun and Li, Fei-Fei and Li, Manling},
|
| 163 |
+
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.20937},
|
| 164 |
+
year={2025}
|
| 165 |
}
|
| 166 |
```
|