1
RepeatAfterMe
👁
Generate and check voice consent for cloning
AI & ML interests
✍️ Rigor, 🤝 Consent, 👁️🗨️ Social Consciousness, 🌎 Sustainability, 🧑🤝🧑 Inclusion, and 🤔 Inquisitiveness
Recent Activity
View all activity
meg
updated
a
Space
about 14 hours ago
Remove Sentence Bank and pre-written option
#3 opened about 17 hours ago
by
frimelle
frimelle
updated
a
Space
about 17 hours ago
Text generation with the options of Qwen and Llama Instruct models
1
#2 opened 5 days ago
by
frimelle
Text generation with the options of Qwen and Llama Instruct models
1
#2 opened 5 days ago
by
frimelle
Add function to get prompt to generate consent text (short and long version, long default)
#1 opened 8 days ago
by
frimelle
meg
published
a
Space
8 days ago
Add function to get prompt to generate consent text (short and long version, long default)
#1 opened 8 days ago
by
frimelle
christopher
authored
a
paper
10 days ago
Post
4367
🌎 AI ethics and sustainability are two sides of the same coin.
In our new blog post with Dr. Sasha Luccioni, we argue that separating them (as is too often the case) means missing the bigger picture of how AI systems impact both people and the planet.
Ethical and sustainable AI development can’t be pursued in isolation. The same choices that affect who benefits or is harmed by AI systems also determine how much energy and resources they consume.
We explore how two key concepts, evaluation and transparency, can serve as bridges between these domains:
📊 Evaluation, by moving beyond accuracy or performance metrics to include environmental and social costs, as we’ve done with tools like the AI Energy Score.
🔍 Transparency, by enabling reproducibility, accountability, and environmental reporting through open tools like the Environmental Transparency Space.
AI systems mirror our priorities. If we separate ethics from sustainability, we risk building technologies that are efficient but unjust, or fair but unsustainable.
Read our blog post here: https://huggingface.co/blog/sasha/ethics-sustainability
AIEnergyScore/Leaderboard
sasha/environmental-transparency
In our new blog post with Dr. Sasha Luccioni, we argue that separating them (as is too often the case) means missing the bigger picture of how AI systems impact both people and the planet.
Ethical and sustainable AI development can’t be pursued in isolation. The same choices that affect who benefits or is harmed by AI systems also determine how much energy and resources they consume.
We explore how two key concepts, evaluation and transparency, can serve as bridges between these domains:
📊 Evaluation, by moving beyond accuracy or performance metrics to include environmental and social costs, as we’ve done with tools like the AI Energy Score.
🔍 Transparency, by enabling reproducibility, accountability, and environmental reporting through open tools like the Environmental Transparency Space.
AI systems mirror our priorities. If we separate ethics from sustainability, we risk building technologies that are efficient but unjust, or fair but unsustainable.
Read our blog post here: https://huggingface.co/blog/sasha/ethics-sustainability
AIEnergyScore/Leaderboard
sasha/environmental-transparency
- 1 reply
sasha
authored
3
papers
20 days ago
Estimating the Carbon Footprint of BLOOM, a 176B Parameter Language Model
Paper
•
2211.02001
•
Published
Hype, Sustainability, and the Price of the Bigger-is-Better Paradigm in AI
Paper
•
2409.14160
•
Published
•
3
From Efficiency Gains to Rebound Effects: The Problem of Jevons' Paradox in AI's Polarized Environmental Debate
Paper
•
2501.16548
•
Published
christopher
posted
an
update
21 days ago
Post
2490
AI for Scientific Discovery Won't Work Without Fixing How We Collaborate.
My co-author @cgeorgiaw and I just published a paper challenging a core assumption: that the main barriers to AI in science are technical. They're not. They're social.
Key findings:
🚨 The "AI Scientist" myth delays progress: Waiting for AGI devalues human expertise and obscures science's real purpose: cultivating understanding, not just outputs.
📊 Wrong incentives: Datasets have 100x longer impact than models, yet data curation is undervalued.
⚠️ Broken collaboration: Domain scientists want understanding. ML researchers optimize performance. Without shared language, projects fail.
🔍 Fragmentation costs years: Harmonizing just 9 cancer files took 329 hours.
Why this matters: Upstream bottlenecks like efficient PDE solvers could accelerate discovery across multiple sciences. CASP mobilized a community around protein structure, enabling AlphaFold. We need this for dozens of challenges.
Thus, we're launching Hugging Science! A global community addressing these barriers through collaborative challenges, open toolkits, education, and community-owned infrastructure. Please find all the links below!
Paper: AI for Scientific Discovery is a Social Problem (2509.06580)
Join:
hugging-science
Discord: https://discord.com/invite/VYkdEVjJ5J
My co-author @cgeorgiaw and I just published a paper challenging a core assumption: that the main barriers to AI in science are technical. They're not. They're social.
Key findings:
🚨 The "AI Scientist" myth delays progress: Waiting for AGI devalues human expertise and obscures science's real purpose: cultivating understanding, not just outputs.
📊 Wrong incentives: Datasets have 100x longer impact than models, yet data curation is undervalued.
⚠️ Broken collaboration: Domain scientists want understanding. ML researchers optimize performance. Without shared language, projects fail.
🔍 Fragmentation costs years: Harmonizing just 9 cancer files took 329 hours.
Why this matters: Upstream bottlenecks like efficient PDE solvers could accelerate discovery across multiple sciences. CASP mobilized a community around protein structure, enabling AlphaFold. We need this for dozens of challenges.
Thus, we're launching Hugging Science! A global community addressing these barriers through collaborative challenges, open toolkits, education, and community-owned infrastructure. Please find all the links below!
Paper: AI for Scientific Discovery is a Social Problem (2509.06580)
Join:
hugging-science
Discord: https://discord.com/invite/VYkdEVjJ5J
Post
2138
Cool stuff these past weeks on huggingface! 🤗 🚀 !
• 📈Trackio, local-first W&B alternative
https://github.com/gradio-app/trackio/issues
• 🌍EmbeddingGemma, 300M-param, multilingual embeddings, on-device
https://huggingface.co/blog/embeddinggemma
• 💻Open LLMs in VS Code (Inference Providers)
https://x.com/reach_vb/status/1966185427582497171
• 🤖Smol2Operator GUI agents
https://huggingface.co/blog/smol2operator
• 🖼️Gradio visible watermarking
https://huggingface.co/blog/watermarking-with-gradio
• 📈Trackio, local-first W&B alternative
https://github.com/gradio-app/trackio/issues
• 🌍EmbeddingGemma, 300M-param, multilingual embeddings, on-device
https://huggingface.co/blog/embeddinggemma
• 💻Open LLMs in VS Code (Inference Providers)
https://x.com/reach_vb/status/1966185427582497171
• 🤖Smol2Operator GUI agents
https://huggingface.co/blog/smol2operator
• 🖼️Gradio visible watermarking
https://huggingface.co/blog/watermarking-with-gradio
meg
updated
a
Space
27 days ago
Can anyone help in getting this space to run
1
#9 opened 28 days ago
by
djc998
Post
10832
One of the hardest challenges in AI safety is finding the right balance: how do we protect people from harm without undermining their agency? This tension is especially visible in conversational systems, where safeguards can sometimes feel more paternalistic than supportive.
In my latest piece for Hugging Face, I argue that open source and community-driven approaches offer a promising (though not exclusive) way forward.
✨ Transparency can make safety mechanisms into learning opportunities.
✨ Collaboration with diverse communities makes safeguards more relevant across contexts.
✨ Iteration in the open lets protections evolve rather than freeze into rigid, one-size-fits-all rules.
Of course, this isn’t a silver bullet. Top-down safety measures will still be necessary in some cases. But if we only rely on corporate control, we risk building systems that are safe at the expense of trust and autonomy.
Read the blog post here: https://huggingface.co/blog/giadap/preserving-agency
In my latest piece for Hugging Face, I argue that open source and community-driven approaches offer a promising (though not exclusive) way forward.
✨ Transparency can make safety mechanisms into learning opportunities.
✨ Collaboration with diverse communities makes safeguards more relevant across contexts.
✨ Iteration in the open lets protections evolve rather than freeze into rigid, one-size-fits-all rules.
Of course, this isn’t a silver bullet. Top-down safety measures will still be necessary in some cases. But if we only rely on corporate control, we risk building systems that are safe at the expense of trust and autonomy.
Read the blog post here: https://huggingface.co/blog/giadap/preserving-agency
- 7 replies
Post
2853
🤖 As AI-generated content is shared in movies/TV/across the web, there's one simple low-hanging fruit 🍇 to help know what's real: Visible watermarks. With the Gradio team, I've made sure it's trivially easy to add this disclosure to images, video, chatbot text. See how: https://huggingface.co/blog/watermarking-with-gradio
Thanks to the code collab in particular from @abidlabs and Yuvraj Sharma.
Thanks to the code collab in particular from @abidlabs and Yuvraj Sharma.