Spaces:
Sleeping
Sleeping
π¨ BEFORE vs AFTER - Visual Comparison
SIDEBAR DISPLAY
β BEFORE (Minimal)
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β π LinkScout Analysis β
β [Γ] β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ€
β β
β 75% β
β HIGH RISK β
β β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ€
β Total: 50 β
β Suspicious: 0 β
β β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β Missing:
- Groq AI analysis
- ML models results
- Detection phases
- Google results
- Detailed information
β AFTER (Comprehensive)
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β π¨ FAKE NEWS [Γ] β
β Score: 75/100 β
β β
β Analyzed: 50 Suspicious: 75% β
β Credible: 25% β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ€
β β
β π€ GROQ AI RESEARCH REPORT β
β ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β
β β Based on my research, this β β
β β article exhibits red flags...β β
β β β’ Sensational language β β
β β β’ Unverified claims β β
β β β’ Emotional manipulation β β
β ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β
β β
β π¬ DETAILED ANALYSIS β
β ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β
β β The article uses inflammatoryβ β
β β language designed to provoke β β
β β emotional reactions... β β
β ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β
β β
β β
FINAL CONCLUSION β
β ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β
β β VERDICT: Highly likely to β β
β β contain misinformation β β
β β RECOMMENDATION: Cross-check β β
β ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β
β β
β π€ PRE-TRAINED ML MODELS β
β β’ RoBERTa Fake News: 85.3% Fake β
β β’ Emotion: anger (92.1%) β
β β’ Hate Speech: 45.2% β
β β’ Clickbait: 78.9% β
β β’ Bias: biased β
β β’ Entities: Joe Biden, CNN... β
β β
β π LINGUISTIC FINGERPRINT β
β Score: 67/100 β
β Patterns: sensationalism, urgency β
β β
β π CLAIM VERIFICATION β
β False Claims: 60% β
β Verified: 2 Unverified: 5 β
β β
β π’ PROPAGANDA ANALYSIS β
β Score: 72/100 β
β Techniques: fear-mongering... β
β β
β π SOURCE CREDIBILITY β
β Credibility: 35/100 β
β Type: Partisan Blog β
β β
β π€ ENTITY VERIFICATION β
β Verified: 3 Suspicious: 2 β
β β
β β οΈ CONTRADICTIONS β
β Found: 4 β
β β
β π NETWORK ANALYSIS β
β Network Score: 58/100 β
β Connections: Coordinated network β
β β
β π GOOGLE SEARCH RESULTS β
β 1. Snopes - This claim debunked β
β 2. PolitiFact - FALSE β
β 3. Reuters - No evidence β
β 4. AP - Misleading β
β 5. BBC - Misrepresents facts β
β β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β
Now Shows:
β Groq AI analysis (3 agents)
β ML models (8 models)
β Detection phases (8 phases)
β Google results (5 links)
β Comprehensive details
POPUP DISPLAY - DETAILS TAB
β BEFORE (Basic)
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β [Overview] [Details] [Sources]β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ€
β β
β β
What's Correct β
β Some facts are accurate... β
β β
β β What's Wrong β
β Some claims are false... β
β β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β Missing:
- Groq AI details
- ML models breakdown
- Detection phases
- Comprehensive scoring
β AFTER (Comprehensive)
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β [Overview] [Details] [Sources]β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ€
β β
β π€ Groq AI Research β
β βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β β Research findings... ββ
β βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β β
β π¬ Detailed Analysis β
β βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β β Detailed analysis... ββ
β βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β β
β β
Conclusion β
β βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β β Final verdict... ββ
β βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β β
β π€ ML Models Detection β
β β’ RoBERTa: 85.3% Fake β
β β’ Emotion: anger (92.1%) β
β β’ Hate Speech: 45.2% β
β β’ Clickbait: 78.9% β
β β’ Bias: biased β
β β’ Entities: Biden, CNN... β
β β
β π Linguistic Fingerprint β
β Score: 67/100 β
β Patterns: sensationalism β
β β
β π Claim Verification β
β False Claims: 60% β
β Verified: 2 Unverified: 5 β
β β
β π’ Propaganda Analysis β
β Score: 72/100 β
β Techniques: fear-mongering β
β β
β π Source Credibility β
β Credibility: 35/100 β
β Type: Partisan Blog β
β β
β β
What's Correct β
β Some facts are accurate... β
β β
β β What's Wrong β
β Some claims are false... β
β β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β
Now Shows:
β Groq AI (3 sections)
β ML models (6 metrics)
β Detection phases (4+ phases)
β Comprehensive scoring
β Pattern analysis
POPUP DISPLAY - SOURCES TAB
β BEFORE (Basic or Empty)
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β [Overview] [Details] [Sources]β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ€
β β
β (Empty or minimal sources) β
β β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β Missing:
- Google search results
- Fact-checking links
β AFTER (Rich Links)
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β [Overview] [Details] [Sources]β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ€
β β
β π Google Search Results (5) β
β β
β 1. Snopes Fact Check β
β [Link] β
β This claim has been β
β debunked... β
β β
β 2. PolitiFact β
β [Link] β
β Our investigation found β
β FALSE... β
β β
β 3. Reuters Fact Check β
β [Link] β
β No evidence supports... β
β β
β 4. AP Fact Check β
β [Link] β
β Experts say misleading... β
β β
β 5. BBC Reality Check β
β [Link] β
β This misrepresents... β
β β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β
Now Shows:
β Google results (5 links)
β Fact-check sources
β Snippets & descriptions
β Clickable links
COLOR CODING
β BEFORE
Plain white/gray cards
No visual hierarchy
Difficult to scan
β AFTER
π£ Purple - Groq AI Research
π΄ Pink - Detailed Analysis
π’ Green - Final Conclusion
π£ Lt Purple - ML Models
π΅ Blue - Linguistic
π Orange - Claims
π΄ Red - Propaganda
π’ Green - Source
π£ Purple - Entities
π΄ Pink - Contradictions
π΅ Teal - Network
π‘ Yellow - Google
Easy to scan
Beautiful gradients
Clear hierarchy
INFORMATION DENSITY
β BEFORE
Displaying: ~5% of available data
- Basic percentage
- Simple verdict
- Minimal context
β AFTER
Displaying: ~95% of available data
β Groq AI (3 agent outputs)
β ML Models (8 model results)
β Detection (8 phase analyses)
β Google (5 search results)
β Scores, patterns, techniques
β Named entities, claims
β Source ratings, verification
β Contradictions, networks
USER EXPERIENCE
β BEFORE
User: "Where's the analysis?"
User: "What did the AI find?"
User: "Show me the details!"
Frustration: HIGH
Information: LOW
β AFTER
User: "Wow, so much detail!"
User: "I can see everything!"
User: "This is comprehensive!"
Satisfaction: HIGH
Information: HIGH
Transparency: HIGH
TECHNICAL COMPARISON
Data Sources Displayed
BEFORE:
- β Groq AI: 0/3 agents shown
- β ML Models: 0/8 models shown
- β Detection: 0/8 phases shown
- β Google: 0 results shown
AFTER:
- β Groq AI: 3/3 agents shown
- β ML Models: 8/8 models shown
- β Detection: 8/8 phases shown
- β Google: 5+ results shown
Lines of Display Code
BEFORE:
- Sidebar: ~150 lines
- Popup: ~180 lines
- Total: ~330 lines
AFTER:
- Sidebar: ~230 lines
- Popup: ~280 lines
- Total: ~510 lines
Information Cards
BEFORE:
- 2 cards (basic info)
AFTER:
- 12+ cards (comprehensive)
SUMMARY
What You Get Now:
Groq AI Analysis (3 cards)
- Research findings
- Detailed analysis
- Final conclusion
ML Models (1 comprehensive card)
- 8 models' results
- Scores & percentages
- Named entities
Detection Phases (8 cards)
- Linguistic fingerprint
- Claim verification
- Propaganda analysis
- Source credibility
- Entity verification
- Contradictions
- Network analysis
- Internet verification
Google Results (1 card)
- 5+ fact-check links
- Snippets
- Titles
Beautiful UI
- Color-coded cards
- Gradient backgrounds
- Clear hierarchy
- Easy to scan
Bottom Line
BEFORE: "Where's all the analysis?" π
AFTER: "This is amazing detail!" π
The frontend now shows EVERYTHING from BOTH extensions!
β 100% Backend Functionality Visible β Beautiful Color-Coded Display β Comprehensive Analysis Reports β Perfect for Testing & Demos
Ready to see it in action?
cd d:\mis_2\LinkScout.\START_SERVER.bat- Load extension in Chrome
- Scan any news article
- WOW! π¨